>-----Original Message-----
>From: Roper, Matthew D
>Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 3:50 AM
>To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lankhorst, Maarten
><maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxx>; Syrjala, Ville <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxx>; Sharma,
>Shashank <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [v6 4/6] drm/i915/icl: Enable ICL Pipe CSC block
>
>On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:51:35PM +0530, Uma Shankar wrote:
>> Enable ICL pipe csc hardware. CSC block is enabled in CSC_MODE
>> register instead of PLANE_COLOR_CTL.
>>
>> ToDO: Extend the ABI to accept 32 bit coefficient values instead of
>> 16bit for future platforms.
>>
>> v2: Addressed Maarten's review comments.
>>
>> v3: Addressed Matt's review comments. Removed rmw patterns as
>> suggested by Matt.
>>
>> v4: Addressed Matt's review comments.
>>
>> v5: Addressed Ville's review comments.
>>
>> v6: Separated pipe output csc programming from regular csc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 ++++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index a84200f..3c3a902 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -9861,10 +9861,13 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>> #define _PIPE_A_CSC_COEFF_BU 0x4901c
>> #define _PIPE_A_CSC_COEFF_RV_GV 0x49020
>> #define _PIPE_A_CSC_COEFF_BV 0x49024
>> +
>> #define _PIPE_A_CSC_MODE 0x49028
>> -#define CSC_BLACK_SCREEN_OFFSET (1 << 2)
>> -#define CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA (1 << 1)
>> -#define CSC_MODE_YUV_TO_RGB (1 << 0)
>> +#define ICL_CSC_ENABLE (1 << 31)
>> +#define CSC_BLACK_SCREEN_OFFSET (1 << 2)
>> +#define CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA (1 << 1)
>> +#define CSC_MODE_YUV_TO_RGB (1 << 0)
>> +
>> #define _PIPE_A_CSC_PREOFF_HI 0x49030
>> #define _PIPE_A_CSC_PREOFF_ME 0x49034
>> #define _PIPE_A_CSC_PREOFF_LO 0x49038
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> index 494891c..9b8d2de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static void ilk_load_ycbcr_conversion_matrix(struct
>intel_crtc *crtc)
>> I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_HI(pipe), POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_HI);
>> I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_ME(pipe),
>POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_ME);
>> I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_LO(pipe), POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_LO);
>> +
>> I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_MODE(pipe), 0);
>> }
>
>Seems like an unintentional change?
Ok, will drop this extra line. Did it intentionally though as wanted to separate the
co-efficients programming from the mode. It's not related to this patch.
Thanks Matt for the review.
Regards,
Uma Shankar
>Otherwise, this looks good now that the output csc for rgb->yuv is moved to the
>next patch.
>
>Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> @@ -242,7 +243,10 @@ static void ilk_load_csc_matrix(struct intel_crtc_state
>*crtc_state)
>> I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_ME(pipe), postoff);
>> I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_LO(pipe), postoff);
>>
>> - I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_MODE(pipe), 0);
>> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
>> + I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_MODE(pipe), ICL_CSC_ENABLE);
>> + else
>> + I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_MODE(pipe), 0);
>> } else {
>> uint32_t mode = CSC_MODE_YUV_TO_RGB;
>>
>> @@ -692,6 +696,7 @@ void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> dev_priv->display.load_csc_matrix = ilk_load_csc_matrix;
>> dev_priv->display.load_luts = glk_load_luts;
>> } else if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) {
>> + dev_priv->display.load_csc_matrix = ilk_load_csc_matrix;
>> dev_priv->display.load_luts = icl_load_luts;
>> } else {
>> dev_priv->display.load_luts = i9xx_load_luts;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
>--
>Matt Roper
>Graphics Software Engineer
>IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
>Intel Corporation
>(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
