Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_shrink: Exercise OOM and other routes to shrinking in reasonable time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/01/2019 11:28, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:12:30AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 07/01/2019 11:01, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 03:37:09PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
index 73d127603d28..d76a4b3b1c71 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ igt@gem_ring_sync_copy(@.*)?
   igt@gem_ring_sync_loop(@.*)?
   igt@gem_seqno_wrap(@.*)?
   igt@gem_shrink@(?!reclaim$).*
+igt@gem_shrink@(?!reclaims-and-oom).*
   igt@gem_softpin@.*(hang|S4).*
   igt@gem_spin_batch(@.*)?
   igt@gem_stolen@.*hibernate.*


In case you didn't notice: The first gem_shrink line removes the
reclaims-and-oom* subtests, and the second line (the one you added)
then removes the 'reclaim' subtest, resulting in all gem_shrink
subtests blacklisted.

No I haven't thank you. Interestingly the reclaim subtest still did run.

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_2185/shards-all.html
it's NOTRUN on all machines on patched IGT.

My fail while looking at the pages.. I saw the test mentioned in the list but fail to spot that was only because it was run in the baseline. :I

Okay, but in essence should this work then:

   igt@gem_shrink@(?!reclaim).*

To blacklist everything apart from reclaims and reclaims-and-oom.*
subtests?

Yeah that looks correct.

Thanks, I'll send a v2 shortly.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux