On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:12:30AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 07/01/2019 11:01, Petri Latvala wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 03:37:09PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt > > > index 73d127603d28..d76a4b3b1c71 100644 > > > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt > > > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt > > > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ igt@gem_ring_sync_copy(@.*)? > > > igt@gem_ring_sync_loop(@.*)? > > > igt@gem_seqno_wrap(@.*)? > > > igt@gem_shrink@(?!reclaim$).* > > > +igt@gem_shrink@(?!reclaims-and-oom).* > > > igt@gem_softpin@.*(hang|S4).* > > > igt@gem_spin_batch(@.*)? > > > igt@gem_stolen@.*hibernate.* > > > > > > In case you didn't notice: The first gem_shrink line removes the > > reclaims-and-oom* subtests, and the second line (the one you added) > > then removes the 'reclaim' subtest, resulting in all gem_shrink > > subtests blacklisted. > > No I haven't thank you. Interestingly the reclaim subtest still did run. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_2185/shards-all.html it's NOTRUN on all machines on patched IGT. > Okay, but in essence should this work then: > > igt@gem_shrink@(?!reclaim).* > > To blacklist everything apart from reclaims and reclaims-and-oom.* > subtests? Yeah that looks correct. -- Petri Latvala _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
