Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_shrink: Exercise OOM and other routes to shrinking in reasonable time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/01/2019 12:31, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Michał Winiarski (2019-01-07 12:27:07)
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 03:37:09PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

A set of subtests which exercises different paths to our shrinker code
(including the OOM killer) in predictable and reasonable time budget.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/igt_core.c                        |  19 ++
  lib/igt_core.h                        |   1 +
  tests/i915/gem_shrink.c               | 399 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt          |   1 +
  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist |   3 +
  5 files changed, 423 insertions(+)

[snip]

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_shrink.c b/tests/i915/gem_shrink.c
index c8e05814ee70..7c002de0ef1f 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_shrink.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_shrink.c
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@
   *
   * Exercise the shrinker by overallocating GEM objects
   */
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
#include "igt.h"
  #include "igt_gt.h"
@@ -366,6 +370,376 @@ static void reclaim(unsigned engine, int timeout)
       close(fd);
  }
+static unsigned long get_meminfo(const char *info, const char *tag)
+{
+     const char *str;
+     unsigned long val;
+
+     str = strstr(info, tag);
+     if (str && sscanf(str + strlen(tag), " %lu", &val) == 1)
+             return val >> 10;
+
+     igt_warn("Unrecognised /proc/meminfo field: '%s'\n", tag);
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned long get_avail_ram_mb(void)
+{
+     int fd;
+     int ret;
+     char buf[4096];
+     unsigned long ram;
+
+     fd = open("/proc/meminfo", O_RDONLY);
+     igt_assert_fd(fd);
+
+     ret = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
+     igt_assert(ret >= 0);
+
+     close(fd);
+
+     ram = get_meminfo(buf, "MemAvailable:");
+     ram += get_meminfo(buf, "Buffers:");
+     ram += get_meminfo(buf, "Cached:");
+     ram += get_meminfo(buf, "SwapCached:");
+
+     return ram;
+}

What's wrong with ones from intel_os.c?

They pull in both an i915 and mm purge, which iirc, had to be avoided
here.

Yep. I can sense a suggestion of adding a lighter weight version to the library now.. :)

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux