Re: drm/i915/watchdog: move emit_stop_watchdog until the very end of the ring commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/01/2019 02:40, Carlos Santa wrote:
From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>

On command streams that could potentially hang the GPU after a last
flush command, it's best not to cancel the watchdog
until after all commands have executed.

Patch shared by Michel Thierry through IIRC after reproduction on

Joonas pointed out on IRC that IRC is called IRC. :)

my local setup.

Tested-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 0afcbeb18329..25ba5fcc9466 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1885,8 +1885,8 @@ static int gen8_emit_bb_start(struct i915_request *rq,
  		GEM_BUG_ON(!engine->emit_start_watchdog ||
  			   !engine->emit_stop_watchdog);
- /* + start_watchdog (6) + stop_watchdog (4) */
-		num_dwords += 10;
+		/* + start_watchdog (6) */
+		num_dwords += 6;
  		watchdog_running = true;
          }
@@ -1927,10 +1927,7 @@ static int gen8_emit_bb_start(struct i915_request *rq,
  	*cs++ = MI_ARB_ON_OFF | MI_ARB_DISABLE;
  	*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
- if (watchdog_running) {
-		/* Cancel watchdog timer */
-		cs = engine->emit_stop_watchdog(rq, cs);
-	}
+	// XXX: emit_stop_watchdog happens in gen8_emit_breadcrumb_vcs

No C++ comments please. And what does XXX mean? Doesn't feel like it belongs.

intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
  	return 0;
@@ -2189,6 +2186,37 @@ static void gen8_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
  }
  static const int gen8_emit_breadcrumb_sz = 6 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS;
+static void gen8_emit_breadcrumb_vcs(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
+{
+	/* w/a: bit 5 needs to be zero for MI_FLUSH_DW address. */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX_ADDR & (1 << 5));
+
+	cs = gen8_emit_ggtt_write(cs, request->global_seqno,
+				  intel_hws_seqno_address(request->engine));
+	*cs++ = MI_USER_INTERRUPT;
+	*cs++ = MI_ARB_ON_OFF | MI_ARB_ENABLE;
+
+	// stop_watchdog at the very end of the ring commands
+	if (request->gem_context->__engine[VCS].watchdog_threshold != 0)

VCS is wrong. Whole check needs to be to_intel_context(ctx, engine)->watchdog_threshold I think.

+	{
+		/* Cancel watchdog timer */
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!request->engine->emit_stop_watchdog);
+		cs = request->engine->emit_stop_watchdog(request, cs);
+	}
+	else
+	{

Coding style is wrong (curly braces for if else).

+		*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
+		*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
+		*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
+		*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
+	}
+
+	request->tail = intel_ring_offset(request, cs);
+	assert_ring_tail_valid(request->ring, request->tail);
+	gen8_emit_wa_tail(request, cs);
+}
+static const int gen8_emit_breadcrumb_vcs_sz = 6 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS + 4; //+4 for optional stop_watchdog
+
  static void gen8_emit_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
  {
  	/* We're using qword write, seqno should be aligned to 8 bytes. */
@@ -2306,8 +2334,17 @@ logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  	engine->request_alloc = execlists_request_alloc;
engine->emit_flush = gen8_emit_flush;
-	engine->emit_breadcrumb = gen8_emit_breadcrumb;
-	engine->emit_breadcrumb_sz = gen8_emit_breadcrumb_sz;
+
+	if (engine->id == VCS || engine->id == VCS2)

What about VCS3 or 4? Hint use engine class.

And what about RCS and VECS?

+	{
+		engine->emit_breadcrumb = gen8_emit_breadcrumb_vcs;
+		engine->emit_breadcrumb_sz = gen8_emit_breadcrumb_vcs_sz;
+	}
+	else
+	{
+		engine->emit_breadcrumb = gen8_emit_breadcrumb;
+		engine->emit_breadcrumb_sz = gen8_emit_breadcrumb_sz;
+	}
engine->set_default_submission = intel_execlists_set_default_submission;

Looks like the patch should be squashed with the one which implements watchdog emit start/end? I mean if the whole setup has broken edge cases without this..

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux