Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/fixed: simplify FP_16_16_MAX definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-11-15 14:01:24)
>> No need to use a compound statement enclosed in parenthesis where a C99
>> compound literal will do. No functional changes.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Out of curiosity, did this have an effect on asm generation?
> Presumably not.

For some reason it caused tons of label etc. changes so it was hard to
check, but I didn't spot any functional asm changes.

BR,
Jani.



>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Regards, Joonas

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux