Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-11-15 12:01:24) > No need to use a compound statement enclosed in parenthesis where a C99 > compound literal will do. No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h > index 08316e50167a..927c59395569 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h > @@ -7,11 +7,7 @@ typedef struct { > u32 val; > } uint_fixed_16_16_t; > > -#define FP_16_16_MAX ({ \ > - uint_fixed_16_16_t fp; \ > - fp.val = UINT_MAX; \ > - fp; \ > -}) > +#define FP_16_16_MAX ((uint_fixed_16_16_t){ .val = UINT_MAX }) Following the standard set by pgprot_t #define u16_16(x) ((u16_16_t){ .val = (x) }) #define U16_16_MAX u16_16(U32_MAX) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx