Unfortunately drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device which is called from both
drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_rep seem to rely
on that mgr->mst_primary is not NULL, which seem to be wrong as it can be
cleared with simultaneous mode set, if probing fails or in other case.
mgr->lock mutex doesn't protect against that as it might just get
assigned to NULL right before, not simultaneously.
There are currently bugs 107738, 108616 bugs which crash in
drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device, caused by this issue.
v2: Refactored the code, as it was nicely noticed.
Fixed Bugzilla bug numbers(second was 108616, but not 108816)
and added links.
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108616
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107738
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 5ff1d79b86c4..0e0df398222d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -1275,6 +1275,9 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_
mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
mstb = mgr->mst_primary;
+ if (!mstb)
+ goto out;
+
for (i = 0; i < lct - 1; i++) {
int shift = (i % 2) ? 0 : 4;
int port_num = (rad[i / 2] >> shift) & 0xf;
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
