Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Make the rcu_head known to the system, in particular for debugobjects. > And having declared it for debugobjects, we need to tidy up afterwards. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108691 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 5b80b0c14aed..24f126ccf21e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -4739,6 +4739,8 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->lut_list); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->batch_pool_link); > > + init_rcu_head(&obj->rcu); > + > obj->ops = ops; > > reservation_object_init(&obj->__builtin_resv); > @@ -4941,6 +4943,8 @@ static void __i915_gem_free_objects(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > drm_gem_object_release(&obj->base); > i915_gem_info_remove_obj(i915, obj->base.size); > > + destroy_rcu_head(&obj->rcu); > + It looks like you need to break the union in struct drm_i915_gem_object for this to work. Or did I get the ordering of events wrong? -Mika > kfree(obj->bit_17); > i915_gem_object_free(obj); > > -- > 2.19.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
