Re: [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Add support to force specific module load

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I would like to know if there is any improvement that I can do for this
patchset.

Thanks

On 07/07, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> This patchset adds support for forcing a specific module to be loaded
> via command line. This feature can bring benefits for developers that
> need to create a new module since they can use IGT as a base test to
> guide their development (Test-driven development - TDD ). The first
> patch, expand the size of the module name accepted by IGT to make
> possible that modules with larger names can be loaded. The second patch
> has the force option implementation.
> 
> The discussion about this feature started with an RFC named "[PATCH
> i-g-t] [RFC] Add support to force specific module load", link:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg166764.html
> 
> Rodrigo Siqueira (2):
>   Increase the string size for a module name
>   Add support for forcing specific module
> 
>  lib/drmtest.c        | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  lib/igt_core.c       | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/igt_core.h       |  4 ++++
>  scripts/run-tests.sh |  4 +++-
>  4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

-- 
Rodrigo Siqueira
http://siqueira.tech
Graduate Student
Department of Computer Science
University of São Paulo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux