On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The check for level being less than zero always false because flags
>> is currently unsigned and can never be negative. Fix this by making
>> flags a s32.
>>
>> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468363 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> V2: Make flags s32 rather than remove the GEM_BUG_ON check, thanks to
>> Ville Syrjälä for spotting the mistake in my first attempt.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
>> index 116f4ccf1bbd..fb31f5004bcf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
>> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> static u32 get_log_control_flags(void)
>> {
>> u32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;
>> - u32 flags = 0;
>> + s32 flags = 0;
>>
>> GEM_BUG_ON(level < 0);
>
> Only insane people use "s32" when it's not part of the hardware spec and
> you changed the wrong variable...
Yeah, int level.
Also,
Fixes: cb5d64e9f13e ("drm/i915/guc: Allow user to control default GuC logging")
BR,
Jani.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
