On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The check for level being less than zero always false because flags
> is currently unsigned and can never be negative. Fix this by making
> flags a s32.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468363 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> V2: Make flags s32 rather than remove the GEM_BUG_ON check, thanks to
> Ville Syrjälä for spotting the mistake in my first attempt.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> index 116f4ccf1bbd..fb31f5004bcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
> static u32 get_log_control_flags(void)
> {
> u32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;
> - u32 flags = 0;
> + s32 flags = 0;
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(level < 0);
Only insane people use "s32" when it's not part of the hardware spec and
you changed the wrong variable...
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
