Setting PCH type to PCH_NOP before checking whether we actually have a
PCH ends up returning true for HAS_PCH_SPLIT() on all non-PCH split
platforms. Fix this by using PCH_NOP only for platforms that actually
have a PCH.
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Should we log this with "Found No Point PCH"? ;)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 1842a067a604..5deee698881b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -246,14 +246,6 @@ static void intel_detect_pch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct pci_dev *pch = NULL;
- /* In all current cases, num_pipes is equivalent to the PCH_NOP setting
- * (which really amounts to a PCH but no South Display).
- */
- if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->num_pipes == 0) {
- dev_priv->pch_type = PCH_NOP;
- return;
- }
-
/*
* The reason to probe ISA bridge instead of Dev31:Fun0 is to
* make graphics device passthrough work easy for VMM, that only
@@ -293,6 +285,17 @@ static void intel_detect_pch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
break;
}
}
+
+ /*
+ * Use PCH_NOP (PCH but no South Display) for PCH platforms without
+ * display.
+ */
+ if (pch && INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->num_pipes == 0) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Display disabled, reverting to NOP PCH\n");
+ dev_priv->pch_type = PCH_NOP;
+ dev_priv->pch_id = 0;
+ }
+
if (!pch)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No PCH found.\n");
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
