From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
We can always figure out which pipe is affected by the panel power
sequencer lockout mechanism. So no need for the pipe A fallback
anymore. The only case we may have to worry about is an invalid
port select in the power sequencer, but INVALID_PIPE is just fine
in that case. We'll get the WARN about the bogus pps port select
anyway.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 1afd70fdbd85..25285939f987 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@ void assert_panel_unlocked(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
{
i915_reg_t pp_reg;
u32 val;
- enum pipe panel_pipe = PIPE_A;
+ enum pipe panel_pipe = INVALID_PIPE;
bool locked = true;
if (WARN_ON(HAS_DDI(dev_priv)))
--
2.16.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
