Hi Anusha, Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will stall otherwise? I see that the significance of testing with the 4.14 kernel enabled the firmware to be included in the latest Chrome OS kernel ( https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/chromium-os-reviews/jtpHvZOfZ-Q). It is important to similarly include in the mainline and stable kernels to facilitate various distros that are now raising bug reports (for example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1760545). Many thanks, Ian On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 at 08:46, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 21 April 2018 at 11:22, Botello Ortega, Luis > <luis.botello.ortega@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all: > > > > We tested GLK DMC 1.04 FW in last week of September 2017, using the latest drm-tip version for that time (4.14.0-rc2) and according to our results we could declare this FW as acceptable and healthy to be used with kernel version 4.14 . > > However, we cannot guarantee quality and healthy of this FW if it is used in top of current drm-tip kernel (4.17-rc0). > > > > Best Regards > > Luis Botello > > > > > Your measured response is appreciated and raises at least four > possible alternatives for this patch to proceed: > 1. It is normal that firmware is *only* tested at a certain point in > time with the drm-tip version of the mainline kernel so that the > statement 'firmware X is acceptable and healthy to be used with kernel > version Y but is not guaranteed with Y+1 or Y+n' always holds true for > any microarchitecture codename's DMC firmware. Therefore it is > appropriate for this patch to have a restricted 'Cc: > stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14' tag together with an explicit > 'Tested-by: (in 4.14)' tag. > 2. As firmware testing was not performed on 4.15 and subsequent > versions, testing is still required on versions 4.15 through to the > current RC of version 4.17 for the patch to receive a 'Tested-by:' tag > together with a 'Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14' tag. > 3. Further firmware testing will only be undertaken for the current RC > of version 4.17 and on successful completion the patch will only > receive a 'Tested-by:' tag. A 'Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' tag is not > applicable. > 4. The firmware was not tested on 4.15 and subsequent versions as it's > functionality was provided by alternative means and therefore the > patch is only required in version 4.14 and should have a 'Cc: > stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14 only' tag together with a restricted > 'Tested-by: (only in 4.14)' tag. > Could you indicate which alternative is appropriate? If further > firmware testing is required (as in points 2 or 3) then can an > expected completion date be provided? > Best regards, > Ian _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
