On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, "Srivatsa, Anusha" <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:27 AM >>To: Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorrison@xxxxxxxxx> >>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; Srivatsa, Anusha >><anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>; Wajdeczko, Michal >><Michal.Wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>; Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; >>airlied@xxxxxxxx; joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >>stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri- >>devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for >>Geminilake >> >>On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> <snip> >>> >>>> >>>> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that >>>> older kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. >>>> >>> >>> I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and >>> v4.15 kernels which I have tested with the patch. I found that earlier >>> kernels didn't support the 'linux-firmware' package required to get >>> wifi working on Intel's new Gemini Lake NUC. >> >>You realize that this patch should have nothing to do with wifi? >> >>Rodrigo, Anusha, if you think Cc: stable is appropriate, please indicate the specific >>versions of stable it is appropriate for. > > Hi Jani, > > The stable kernel version is 4.12 and beyond. > It is appropriate to add the CC: stable in my opinion Who tested the firmware with v4.12 and later? We only have the CI results against *current* drm-tip. We don't even know about v4.16. I'm not going to ack and take responsibility for the stable backports unless someone actually comes forward with credible Tested-bys. BR, Jani. > > Anusha >>BR, >>Jani. >> >>> >>>> >>>> PS. How is this a "RESEND"? I haven't seen this before. >>>> >>> >>> It is a 'RESEND' for that very reason. I initially sent the patch to >>> the same people as a similar patch >>> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10143637/) however after realising >>> this omitted required addresses I added them and resent the patch. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Ian >> >>-- >>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
