On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 14:40 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:23:32PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> wrote:
> > This will be helpful to debug what hardware is actually tracking
> > and causing PSR to exit.
> >
> > BSpec: 7721
> >
> > v4:
> > - Using _MMIO_TRANS2() in PSR_EVENT
> > - Cleaning events before printing
> >
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 45
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 2dad655a710c..391825ae2361 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -4095,6 +4095,29 @@ enum {
> > #define EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_MASK 0xf
> > #define EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT 0
> >
> > +#define _PSR_EVENT_TRANS_A 0x60848
> > +#define _PSR_EVENT_TRANS_B 0x61848
> > +#define _PSR_EVENT_TRANS_C 0x62848
> > +#define _PSR_EVENT_TRANS_D 0x63848
> > +#define _PSR_EVENT_TRANS_EDP 0x6F848
> > +#define PSR_EVENT(trans) _MMIO_TRANS2(trans
> > , _PSR_EVENT_TRANS_A)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_PSR2_WD_TIMER_EXPIRE (1 << 17)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_PSR2_DISABLED (1 << 16)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_SU_DIRTY_FIFO_UNDERRUN (1 << 15)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_SU_CRC_FIFO_UNDERRUN (1 << 14)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_GRAPHICS_RESET (1 << 12)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_PCH_INTERRUPT (1 << 11)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_MEMORY_UP (1 << 10)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_FRONT_BUFFER_MODIFY (1 << 9)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_WD_TIMER_EXPIRE (1 << 8)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_PIPE_REGISTERS_UPDATE (1 << 6)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_REGISTER_UPDATE (1 << 5)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_HDCP_ENABLE (1 << 4)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_KVMR_SESSION_ENABLE (1 << 3)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_VBI_ENABLE (1 << 2)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_LPSP_MODE_EXIT (1 << 1)
> > +#define PSR_EVENT_PSR_DISABLE (1 << 0)
> > +
> > #define EDP_PSR2_STATUS _MMIO(0x6f940)
> > #define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK (0xf<<28)
> > #define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT 28
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index e35a3b94fa69..c8d5cdce544f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -125,6 +125,43 @@ void intel_psr_irq_control(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug)
> > I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_IMR, ~mask);
> > }
> >
> > +static void psr_event_print(u32 val, bool psr2_enabled)
> > +{
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR exit events: 0x%x\n", val);
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_PSR2_WD_TIMER_EXPIRE)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tPSR2 watchdog timer expired\n");
> > + if ((val & PSR_EVENT_PSR2_DISABLED) && psr2_enabled)
>
> I'm not sure if we should add this extra psr2_enable check here.
> Probably better to just print the bit reference and move one.
>
> otherwise we might have the risk of having a message
> "PSR exit events:"
> followed by nothing below it
I'm okay with this too but I think is not necessary have 'PSR2
disabled' printed everytime when PSR is enabled.
>
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tPSR2 disabled\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_SU_DIRTY_FIFO_UNDERRUN)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tSU dirty FIFO underrun\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_SU_CRC_FIFO_UNDERRUN)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tSU CRC FIFO underrun\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_GRAPHICS_RESET)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tGraphics reset\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_PCH_INTERRUPT)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tPCH interrupt\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_MEMORY_UP)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tMemory up\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_FRONT_BUFFER_MODIFY)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tFront buffer modification\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_WD_TIMER_EXPIRE)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tPSR watchdog timer expired\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_PIPE_REGISTERS_UPDATE)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tPIPE registers updated\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_REGISTER_UPDATE)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tRegister updated\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_HDCP_ENABLE)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tHDCP enabled\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_KVMR_SESSION_ENABLE)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tKVMR session enabled\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_VBI_ENABLE)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tVBI enabled\n");
> > + if (val & PSR_EVENT_LPSP_MODE_EXIT)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tLPSP mode exited\n");
> > + if ((val & PSR_EVENT_PSR_DISABLE) && !psr2_enabled)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\tPSR disabled\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32
> > psr_iir)
> > {
> > u32 transcoders = BIT(TRANSCODER_EDP);
> > @@ -152,6 +189,14 @@ void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 psr_iir)
> > dev_priv->psr.last_exit = time_ns;
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[transcoder %s] PSR exit
> > completed\n",
> > transcoder_name(cpu_transcod
> > er));
> > +
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> > + u32 val =
> > I915_READ(PSR_EVENT(cpu_transcoder));
> > + bool psr2_enabled = dev_priv-
> > >psr.psr2_enabled;
> > +
> > + I915_WRITE(PSR_EVENT(cpu_transcode
> > r), val);
>
> writing the value back really clears it?
> or should we clear by writting 0 to it?
Yes, it is cleared by writing 1 to the bit.
>
> > + psr_event_print(val,
> > psr2_enabled);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.17.0
> >
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
