On 24 April 2018 at 20:14, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 13 April 2018 at 11:00, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This tries to align with the X.org communities's long-standing >>> tradition of trying to be an inclusive community and handing out >>> commit rights fairly freely. >>> >>> We also tend to not revoke commit rights for people no longer >>> regularly active in a given project, as long as they're still part of >>> the larger community. >>> >>> Finally make sure that commit rights, like anything happening on fd.o >>> infrastructre, is subject to the fd.o's Code of Conduct. >>> >>> v2: Point at MAINTAINERS for contact info (Daniel S.) >>> >>> v3: >>> - Make it clear that commit rights are voluntary and that committers >>> need to acknowledge positively when they're nominated by someone >>> else (Keith). >>> - Encourage committers to drop their commit rights when they're no >>> longer active, and make it clear they'll get readded (Keith). >>> - Add a line that maintainers and committers should actively nominate >>> new committers (me). >>> >>> v4: Typo (Petri). >>> >>> v5: Typo (Sean). >>> >>> v6: Wording clarifications and spelling (Jani). >>> >>> v7: Require an explicit commitment to the documented merge criteria >>> and rules, instead of just the implied one through the Code of Conduct >>> threat (Jani). >>> >>> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Kristian H. Kristensen <hoegsberg@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> If you wonder about the wide distribution list for an igt patch: I'd >>> like to start a discussions about x.org community norms around commit >>> rights at large, at least for all the shared repos. I plan to propose >>> the same text for drm-misc and libdrm too, and hopefully others like >>> mesa/xserver/wayland would follow. >>> >> I think the idea is pretty good, simply highlighting some bits. >> >> What you've outlined in this patch has been in practise for many years: >> a) undocumented, applicable to most xorg projects [1] >> b) documented, mesa > > Hm, I chatted with a few mesa devs about this, and I wasn't aware > there's explicit documentation for mesa. Where is it? I'd very much > want to align as much as we can. > See the "Developer git Access" section in [1]. FWIW I prefer the wording used in this patch and the CoC reference is a big plus. HTH Emil [1] https://www.mesa3d.org/repository.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
