On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 13 April 2018 at 11:00, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This tries to align with the X.org communities's long-standing >> tradition of trying to be an inclusive community and handing out >> commit rights fairly freely. >> >> We also tend to not revoke commit rights for people no longer >> regularly active in a given project, as long as they're still part of >> the larger community. >> >> Finally make sure that commit rights, like anything happening on fd.o >> infrastructre, is subject to the fd.o's Code of Conduct. >> >> v2: Point at MAINTAINERS for contact info (Daniel S.) >> >> v3: >> - Make it clear that commit rights are voluntary and that committers >> need to acknowledge positively when they're nominated by someone >> else (Keith). >> - Encourage committers to drop their commit rights when they're no >> longer active, and make it clear they'll get readded (Keith). >> - Add a line that maintainers and committers should actively nominate >> new committers (me). >> >> v4: Typo (Petri). >> >> v5: Typo (Sean). >> >> v6: Wording clarifications and spelling (Jani). >> >> v7: Require an explicit commitment to the documented merge criteria >> and rules, instead of just the implied one through the Code of Conduct >> threat (Jani). >> >> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Kristian H. Kristensen <hoegsberg@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> If you wonder about the wide distribution list for an igt patch: I'd >> like to start a discussions about x.org community norms around commit >> rights at large, at least for all the shared repos. I plan to propose >> the same text for drm-misc and libdrm too, and hopefully others like >> mesa/xserver/wayland would follow. >> > I think the idea is pretty good, simply highlighting some bits. > > What you've outlined in this patch has been in practise for many years: > a) undocumented, applicable to most xorg projects [1] > b) documented, mesa Hm, I chatted with a few mesa devs about this, and I wasn't aware there's explicit documentation for mesa. Where is it? I'd very much want to align as much as we can. > IMHO having this explicitly documented and others > (wayland/weston/wayland-protocols and xserver repos) following suite > is a big plus. Yeah, that's the idea. Hence plenty of Cc: for this igt patch. -Daniel > > HTH > Emil > > [1] As in all of https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg but xserver -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
