Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-04-09 11:27:17) > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04) > > > > On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Downside being that we either then use atomic64 throughout or we mix > > > atomic32/atomic64 knowing that we're on x86. (I feel like someone else > > > must have solved this problem in a much neater way, before they went to > > > per-cpu stats ;) > > > > Is the winky implying you know who and where? :) We have three potential > > solutions now, even for if the winky is suggesting something. > > Nah, just that atomic/locked counters are so old hat. Not sure if there > remain any good examples for hotpath counters that remain applicable to > our code. With an underlying nudge that perhaps our hotpath code isn't so hot, and if we can squeeze out a few more cycles. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
