Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04) > > On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Downside being that we either then use atomic64 throughout or we mix > > atomic32/atomic64 knowing that we're on x86. (I feel like someone else > > must have solved this problem in a much neater way, before they went to > > per-cpu stats ;) > > Is the winky implying you know who and where? :) We have three potential > solutions now, even for if the winky is suggesting something. Nah, just that atomic/locked counters are so old hat. Not sure if there remain any good examples for hotpath counters that remain applicable to our code. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
