On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:50:26PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:56 AM, Ville Syrjälä
> <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:24:17PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >> This will allow the struct to be embedded in intel_shared_dpll.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 7 -------
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 10 ++++++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> >> index 51c5ae4e9116..52d6e731c3e9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> >> @@ -1877,13 +1877,6 @@ static void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> -struct dpll_info {
> >> - const char *name;
> >> - const int id;
> >> - const struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs *funcs;
> >> - uint32_t flags;
> >> -};
> >> -
> >> struct intel_dpll_mgr {
> >> const struct dpll_info *dpll_info;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> >> index f24ccf443d25..e99d6385478a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> >> @@ -205,6 +205,16 @@ struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs {
> >> struct intel_dpll_hw_state *hw_state);
> >> };
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * struct dpll_info - display PLL platform specific info
> >> + */
> >> +struct dpll_info {
> >> + const char *name;
> >> + const int id;
> >
> > The const here seems pointless. Well, I guess if we go with the copy
> > then it might not be. Although then we get to wonder why 'flags' isn't
> > const.
>
> Here I wanted to do just a code move. Any change would be on top. Since it seems
> the pointer approach is preferred, I'm just going ahead and dropping this.
>
> >
> >> + const struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs *funcs;
> >> + uint32_t flags;
> >
> > This structure seems to be poorly organized for 64bit machines.
>
>
> Yes, there's a 4-bytes right there. Fixing this unfortunately
> involves changing
> all tables inside dpll_mgr.c.
Those aren't using named initializers?
> I'm sending the reordering as the last
> patch in v2.
>
> thanks
> Lucas De Marchi
>
> >
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> /**
> >> * struct intel_shared_dpll - display PLL with tracked state and users
> >> */
> >> --
> >> 2.14.3
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
>
> --
> Lucas De Marchi
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
