CCing checkpatch maintainers On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 06:36:16PM +0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Reword warning for missing cases (rev2) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39821/ > State : warning > > == Summary == > > $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip > 7cb94d2c3c47 drm/i915: Reword warning for missing cases > -:40: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'x' - possible side-effects? > #40: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h:43: > +#define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ > + __stringify(x), (long)(x)) checkpatch seems wrong here since __stringify() doesn't evaluate x. And it looks similar to the one fixed by e942e2c3f7e0 ("checkpatch: fix stringification macro defect") Lucas De Marchi > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 10 lines checked > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
