Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-03-19 17:37:20) > In some places we end up converting switch statements to a series of > if/else, particularly when introducing helper functions to handle a > group of cases. It's tempting to either leave a wrong warning (since now > we don't have a switch case anymore) or to convert to WARN(1, ...), > but we can just provide a better message and avoid the doubt when such > conversions arrise. > > Introducing a warning inside i915_driver_load() just for tests we get: > > [ 4535.233717] Missing case (ret == 0) > [ 4535.233868] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 795 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1341 i915_driver_load+0x42/0x10e0 [i915] > > which is clear enough. > > v2: remove __func__ since this is already on the warning. > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
