Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-12 10:42:56) > Quoting Min He (2018-03-12 06:17:10) > > In i915_request_wait(), it adds a local intel_wait variable into rb tree > > of waiters. However, when the corresponding request is preempted, the > > seqno of this wait will not be updated, which will lead to a false > > signaling to the request and cause the i915_request_wait() to return > > early before the request is really completed. > > Incorrect. We confirm that the request wasn't preempted before > signaling. Once i915_seqno_passed + intel_wait_check_request, we cannot > unsubmit the request. Or to put it another way, there is an assertion there that would fire if we make a mistake; you should cite that oops in the commit message. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
