Quoting Min He (2018-03-12 06:17:10) > In i915_request_wait(), it adds a local intel_wait variable into rb tree > of waiters. However, when the corresponding request is preempted, the > seqno of this wait will not be updated, which will lead to a false > signaling to the request and cause the i915_request_wait() to return > early before the request is really completed. Incorrect. We confirm that the request wasn't preempted before signaling. Once i915_seqno_passed + intel_wait_check_request, we cannot unsubmit the request. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
