On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 13:58:48 +0100, Petri Latvala
<petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-08 09:50:33)
>> This is a resend, to make patchwork happy.
>> All patches already been reviewed.
>
> It's still being ignored. :(
At least patchwork detected this as a series [1], often that's the
problem.
Patchwork is not seeing patch 4/4, and due to its weird logic, it's
still waiting for it instead of considering the series "incomplete".
Looking at the series page, it doesn't even have a revision number.
This causes the pw REST api to show the series as one with 0 patches
when listing series, there's no series-new-revision event (CI is
watching that), and it also causes the below:
I tried to start testing manually from patchwork, it gives me "failed!".
Arek checked the logs and patch 4/4 hasn't been received by pw at
all. Maybe it's still on the way, who knows.
I'm not sure if this is related, but list archive decided to assign
patch 1/4 [1] to old series [2] instead new one [3]
[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158080.html
[2]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/thread.html#157974
[3]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/thread.html#158081
ps. patch 4/4 is already in archive [4]
[4] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158082.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
