Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/i915: misc fixes in headers (RESEND)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-08 09:50:33)
> >> This is a resend, to make patchwork happy.
> >> All patches already been reviewed. 
> >
> > It's still being ignored. :(
> 
> At least patchwork detected this as a series [1], often that's the
> problem.


Patchwork is not seeing patch 4/4, and due to its weird logic, it's
still waiting for it instead of considering the series "incomplete".

Looking at the series page, it doesn't even have a revision number.

This causes the pw REST api to show the series as one with 0 patches
when listing series, there's no series-new-revision event (CI is
watching that), and it also causes the below:

> I tried to start testing manually from patchwork, it gives me "failed!".


Arek checked the logs and patch 4/4 hasn't been received by pw at
all. Maybe it's still on the way, who knows.


-- 
Petri Latvala
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux