Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/guc: s/intel_guc_fw_upload/intel_guc_init_hw/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/1/2018 3:36 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 09:18:18 +0100, Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

GuC and HuC get loaded from intel_uc_init_hw. HuC load function is
named intel_huc_init_hw, however GuC load function is still named in
old style as intel_guc_fw_upload. Update it and the function doc. for
both functions.
Move of GuC load function's def. & decl. to intel_guc.c|h seems necessary as it is more about core GuC functionality and not so much about fw itself.
This can be done in later patch if needed.


Function intel_guc_fw_upload() was named this way on purpose to follow
object-verb naming pattern, where our object is GuC FW (hence file name
intel_guc_fw.*)

There was a plan to unify this approach with HuC but in the opposite way:
by moving HuC firmware selection code to intel_huc_fw.* but since only
one function will be left in intel_huc.c this action was deferred.

Thanks for background on this.
Note that there will be nothing wrong to call fw_upload functions from
our uc_init_hw function:

intel_uc_init_hw()
  intel_uc_reset()
  intel_huc_fw_upload()
Will just do HuC name change (s/intel_huc_init_hw/intel_huc_fw_upload/) and comments update. HuC related move can be done later.
Is that ok?
intel_guc_fw_upload()
  intel_guc_enable_comm()
  intel_huc_auth()


/Michal

--
Thanks,
Sagar

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux