On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 14:41 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 01:48:37PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > When PSR/PSR2/GTC is enabled hardware can do AUX transactions by it > > self, so lets use the mutex register that is available in gen9+ to > > avoid concurrent access by hardware and driver. > > Older gen handling will be done separated. > > > > Reference: https://01.org/sites/default/files/documentation/intel-gfx-prm-osrc-skl-vol12-display.pdf > > Page 198 - AUX programming sequence > > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 ++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > index eea5b2c537d4..f36e839b4b4f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > @@ -5385,6 +5385,15 @@ enum { > > #define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(c) (((c) - 1) << 5) > > #define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(c) ((c) - 1) > > > > +#define _DPA_AUX_CH_MUTEX (dev_priv->info.display_mmio_offset + 0x6402C) > > +#define _DPB_AUX_CH_MUTEX (dev_priv->info.display_mmio_offset + 0x6412C) > > +#define _DPC_AUX_CH_MUTEX (dev_priv->info.display_mmio_offset + 0x6422C) > > +#define _DPD_AUX_CH_MUTEX (dev_priv->info.display_mmio_offset + 0x6432C) > > +#define _DPF_AUX_CH_MUTEX (dev_priv->info.display_mmio_offset + 0x6452C) > > +#define DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX(port) _MMIO_PORT(port, _DPA_AUX_CH_MUTEX, _DPB_AUX_CH_MUTEX) > > s/port/aux_ch > > > +#define DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX_ENABLE (1 << 31) > > +#define DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX_STATUS (1 << 30) > > + > > /* > > * Computing GMCH M and N values for the Display Port link > > * > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > index 2c3eb90b9499..7004239e4c9e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > @@ -1081,6 +1081,42 @@ static uint32_t intel_dp_get_aux_send_ctl(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > aux_clock_divider); > > } > > > > +static bool intel_dp_aux_ch_trylock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > +{ > > + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = > > + to_i915(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev); > > + > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9) > > + return true; > > + > > + /* Spec says that mutex is acquired when status bit is read as unset, > > + * here waiting for 2msec(+-4 aux transactions) before give up. > > + */ > > + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX(intel_dp->aux_ch), > > + DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX_STATUS, 0, 2)) { > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("aux channel %c locked for 2msec, timing out\n", > > + aux_ch_name(intel_dp->aux_ch)); > > + return false; > > + } > > + With nits that Rodrigo pointed out addressed, feel free to use Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> Btw for future reference, including change log in the commit message is a good idea in the absence of a cover letter. > > + return true; > > +} > > + > > +static void intel_dp_aux_ch_unlock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > +{ > > + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = > > + to_i915(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev); > > + > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9) > > + return; > > + > > + /* set the status bit releases the mutex + keeping mutex enabled */ > > + I915_WRITE(DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX(intel_dp->aux_ch), > > + DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX_ENABLE | DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX_STATUS); > > +} > > + > > static int > > intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > const uint8_t *send, int send_bytes, > > @@ -1119,6 +1155,11 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > > > intel_dp_check_edp(intel_dp); > > > > + if (!intel_dp_aux_ch_trylock(intel_dp)) { > > + ret = -EBUSY; > > + goto out_locked; > > out_"locked" confused me here... > > not sure about a better name... > > maybe out_aux_unlocked ?! :/ > > > + } > > + > > /* Try to wait for any previous AUX channel activity */ > > for (try = 0; try < 3; try++) { > > status = I915_READ_NOTRACE(ch_ctl); > > @@ -1248,6 +1289,8 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > > > ret = recv_bytes; > > out: > > + intel_dp_aux_ch_unlock(intel_dp); > > +out_locked: > > pm_qos_update_request(&dev_priv->pm_qos, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); > > > > if (vdd) > > @@ -1544,6 +1587,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > else > > intel_dp->get_aux_send_ctl = g4x_get_aux_send_ctl; > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) > > + I915_WRITE(DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX(intel_dp->aux_ch), > > + DP_AUX_CH_MUTEX_ENABLE); > > + > > Cool! I believe we are in a good shape now... > > with s/port/aux_ch corrected and preferably with a better goto out name: > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > drm_dp_aux_init(&intel_dp->aux); > > > > /* Failure to allocate our preferred name is not critical */ > > -- > > 2.16.2 > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
