Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-02-26 10:42:40) > On Tue, 20 Feb 2018, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We make use of unsafe kernel parameters in igt, which generates a > > warning and taints the kernel. The warning is unhelpful as we then need > > to filter it out again, so kill it at source. > > Is your goal to upstream this or what? First asking if we see merit in this. If so, I can rewrite the commitmsg to emphasise that this is a direct result of user behaviour and so emitting a WARN is over the top. However, the counter argument is that this sets a kernel taint, so shouldn't it warn as well? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
