On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:22:25PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The unreachable() is very much unreachable and the compiler knows > that, so there's no point in having it. > > Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 83aec68537b4..0dd37c854820 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -12951,8 +12951,6 @@ static bool intel_primary_plane_format_mod_supported(struct drm_plane *plane, > return i965_mod_supported(format, modifier); > else > return i8xx_mod_supported(format, modifier); > - > - unreachable(); > } > > static bool intel_cursor_plane_format_mod_supported(struct drm_plane *plane, > -- > 2.13.6 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
