Op 22-12-17 om 09:55 schreef Mika Kahola: > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 14:40 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Using the fancy new DRM_CAP_CRTC_IN_VBLANK_EVENT cap I can finally >> make this test the work I originally intended to. >> >> For the !modeset case that means performing a pageflip on both >> crtc's, >> then requeueing as soon as the event is delivered and then check the >> vblank counter against the original value, it should be advanced by >> 1. >> >> The modeset case is slightly more complicated, ideally it's handled >> the same, but if we can't perform a modeset and pageflip at the same >> time, fall back to queueing both in a single commit, in which case >> we can say nothing about the vblank counter. >> >> There is a small race between flip_done and hw_done, so make >> flip_nonblocking retry for a second when encountering -EBUSY. >> > Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks, pushed. ~Maarten _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
