On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 2:02:47 PM PST Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:28:35PM +0000, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > (kms_psr_sink_crc:1717) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: > > wait_psr_entry(&data) > > (kms_psr_sink_crc:1717) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl > > for device > > > > isn't very useful, the Source_OK field would have indicated that the > > requirements to enable PSR weren't met in this case. > > Is this still the case with the source_ok getting killed? "Enabled:" will do the same job, conveying whether an attempt to enable PSR was made. > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > > index 831368b2..c586d6e1 100644 > > --- a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > > +++ b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > > @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ static bool wait_psr_entry(data_t *data) > > > > return true; > > > > sleep(1); > > > > } > > > > + igt_debugfs_dump(data->drm_fd, "i915_edp_psr_status"); > > anyways seems a good thing to have... > so, with the commit message modified feel free to use: > > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > Thanks! > > return false; > > > > } > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
