On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:28:35PM +0000, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > (kms_psr_sink_crc:1717) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: > wait_psr_entry(&data) > (kms_psr_sink_crc:1717) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl > for device > > isn't very useful, the Source_OK field would have indicated that the > requirements to enable PSR weren't met in this case. Is this still the case with the source_ok getting killed? > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > index 831368b2..c586d6e1 100644 > --- a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > +++ b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ static bool wait_psr_entry(data_t *data) > return true; > sleep(1); > } > + igt_debugfs_dump(data->drm_fd, "i915_edp_psr_status"); anyways seems a good thing to have... so, with the commit message modified feel free to use: Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > return false; > } > > -- > 2.11.0 > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
