On 08/11/17 17:59, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/11/17 17:27, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quoting Jani Nikula (2017-11-08 13:06:39)
Please use trybot (i.e. send patches to
intel-gfx-trybot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) for hacks that aren't intended
for upstream. Then they can be prioritized appropriately.
We don't have excess to the extended test run on trybot yet...
Marta, Martin, Tomi - this.
Though I believe Chris wants access not excess. ;)
Sssooo... shard-runs for Trybot? Only on success, or also on warning as
with intel-gfx and igt?
The very recent change to run also f-feedback warnings on shards, and
fixed vetting handling, will cause much more shardruns.
After KBL DMC update it could be taken to all the runs, instead of
avoiding it because it's 20 minutes slower (and GLK is 30 minutes more
slower)
We'll see if there's enough time in a day.
IIUC there currently just isn't. The problem is, people are now running
their hack patches on the regular CI to get full runs, and we can't even
prioritize the stuff aimed at upstream over hacks.
If there is possibility to prioritize lower by sending hacks to Trybot,
it might be enough. I don't mind queue if more important stuff is tested
timely and trybot comes later.
Tomi
--
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
