On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/11/17 17:27, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Quoting Jani Nikula (2017-11-08 13:06:39) >>>> >>>> Please use trybot (i.e. send patches to >>>> intel-gfx-trybot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) for hacks that aren't intended >>>> for upstream. Then they can be prioritized appropriately. >>> >>> We don't have excess to the extended test run on trybot yet... >> >> Marta, Martin, Tomi - this. >> >> Though I believe Chris wants access not excess. ;) > > Sssooo... shard-runs for Trybot? Only on success, or also on warning as > with intel-gfx and igt? > > The very recent change to run also f-feedback warnings on shards, and > fixed vetting handling, will cause much more shardruns. > > After KBL DMC update it could be taken to all the runs, instead of > avoiding it because it's 20 minutes slower (and GLK is 30 minutes more > slower) > > We'll see if there's enough time in a day. IIUC there currently just isn't. The problem is, people are now running their hack patches on the regular CI to get full runs, and we can't even prioritize the stuff aimed at upstream over hacks. BR, Jani. > > Tomi -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
