On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:01:13AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:23:43AM -0700, Jeff McGee wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 05:36:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 08:25:33AM -0700, jeff.mcgee@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > From: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Useful for stress testing various reset scenarios. The ioctl that we > > > > have for specific client/context banning disable is difficult to utilize > > > > outside of unit testing. > > > > > > Do we have these stress tests available somewhere? > > > -Daniel > > > > > Potentially any test scenario that relies upon app/umd instead of IGT to > > inject batches that need to be reset would benefit from the ability to > > disable context banning. We are using such scenarios to validate for the > > Yocto APL project, specifically for a feature where preemption of non- > > preemptible batches is forced using reset. It it not needed for IGT-based > > reset stress tests. > > Is that test suite public somewhere? > -Daniel No, but it could be. I don't own it. Anyway, I'll reintroduce this patch when I have a better case to make for it. It was worth a try ;) -Jeff _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
