On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 16:34 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Currently, we are being fairly lazy and only using a wmb() following an > update to an active batch. Previously, we have found that to be > insufficient to ensure that a write from the CPU reaches memory in a > timely fashion, and in some caches we may need to flush a chipset cache. > To that end, we have i915_gem_chipset_flush() so use it. > > Suggested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
