Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-08-29 18:17:22) > On 29/08/17 18:01, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-08-29 17:52:49) > >> Up to Coffeelake we could deduce this GT number from the device ID. > >> This doesn't seem to be the case anymore. This change reorders pciids > >> per GT and adds a gt field to intel_device_info. We set this field on > >> the following platforms : > > Do we also then want to identify the sub-gts? Without a use that smells > > of over-engineering -- I wonder if we've snuck one in anyway, just not > > called it a gt test. > > Hmm I wasn't aware of sub-gts (or maybe I know them under a different name). > Do you mean things like GT3e? The variably sized sseu were for different gt1.5 (and I may be imagining a gt1.2). -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
