Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-08-29 17:52:49) > Up to Coffeelake we could deduce this GT number from the device ID. > This doesn't seem to be the case anymore. This change reorders pciids > per GT and adds a gt field to intel_device_info. We set this field on > the following platforms : Do we also then want to identify the sub-gts? Without a use that smells of over-engineering -- I wonder if we've snuck one in anyway, just not called it a gt test. > - HSW/BDW/SKL/KBL/CFL/CNL Also should apply retrospectively to ivb, and then snb for completeness. (We do have a IS_IVB_GT1 that can then be purged.) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
