On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:19:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Patchwork (2017-08-18 20:41:45) > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: Redo old gmch irq handling (rev2) > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/26215/ > > State : success > > > > == Summary == > > > > Series 26215v2 drm/i915: Redo old gmch irq handling > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/26215/revisions/2/mbox/ > > > > Test gem_exec_flush: > > Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-uc: > > fail -> PASS (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100007 > > Test kms_flip: > > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset: > > skip -> PASS (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781 > > > > fdo#100007 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100007 > > fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781 > > > > fi-blb-e6850 total:279 pass:224 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:54 time:365s > > fi-ilk-650 total:279 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50 time:419s > > fi-pnv-d510 total:279 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:55 time:527s > > That's a reasonably intensive workout of the interrupt handler. Ironlake > in particular is pretty bad at seqno coherency. Would like to have had > the gdg and elk/ctg results, what happened to those? That's a good question. bwr seems to be missing as well. Tomi? -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
