It has now lost its meaning (it shows more than just pin_display), I do not believe that we are using in preference to the complete listing from i915_gem_gtt, or the listing from i915_gem_framebuffer, or the listing of active display objects in i915_display_info. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index f8c888ed017b..0c1bb6963c18 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -513,7 +513,6 @@ static int i915_gem_gtt_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data) struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(node); struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm; - bool show_pin_display_only = !!node->info_ent->data; struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; u64 total_obj_size, total_gtt_size; int count, ret; @@ -524,9 +523,6 @@ static int i915_gem_gtt_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data) total_obj_size = total_gtt_size = count = 0; list_for_each_entry(obj, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list, global_link) { - if (show_pin_display_only && !obj->pin_global) - continue; - seq_puts(m, " "); describe_obj(m, obj); seq_putc(m, '\n'); @@ -4788,7 +4784,6 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = { {"i915_capabilities", i915_capabilities, 0}, {"i915_gem_objects", i915_gem_object_info, 0}, {"i915_gem_gtt", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0}, - {"i915_gem_pin_display", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0, (void *)1}, {"i915_gem_stolen", i915_gem_stolen_list_info }, {"i915_gem_request", i915_gem_request_info, 0}, {"i915_gem_seqno", i915_gem_seqno_info, 0}, -- 2.13.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx