Prefer to defer activating our GEM shrinker until we have a few megabytes to free; or we have accumulated sufficient mempressure by deferring the reclaim to force a shrink. The intent is that because our objects may typically be large, we are too effective at shrinking and are not rewarded for freeing more pages than the batch. It will also defer the initial shrinking to hopefully put it at a lower priority than say the buffer cache (although it will balance out over a number of reclaims, with GEM being more bursty). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c index 5b8bc0e4f336..8bb17e9a52de 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c @@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ void i915_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) dev_priv->mm.shrinker.scan_objects = i915_gem_shrinker_scan; dev_priv->mm.shrinker.count_objects = i915_gem_shrinker_count; dev_priv->mm.shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS; + dev_priv->mm.shrinker.batch = 4096; WARN_ON(register_shrinker(&dev_priv->mm.shrinker)); dev_priv->mm.oom_notifier.notifier_call = i915_gem_shrinker_oom; -- 2.13.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
