On 17-07-31 10:29:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:On 17-07-29 13:53:10, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 26 July 2017 at 19:08, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) { > > intel_primary_formats = skl_primary_formats; > > num_formats = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_primary_formats); > > - modifiers = skl_format_modifiers; > > + if (pipe >= PIPE_C) > > + modifiers = skl_format_modifiers_ccs; > > + else > > + modifiers = skl_format_modifiers_noccs; > > Shouldn't that be (pipe < PIPE_C)? > > Cheers, > Daniel Yep. It was wrong in v7 too :/. I have it fixed locally.Shouldn't the igt catch this, or does it not try to exercise all the plane/crtc combos there are? -Daniel
I don't know whether or not IGT should have caught this, but it wouldn't have because I had been sending these without Ville's patches, so my patches alone don't even build (since his patches defined the modifiers).
-- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
