Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't set fence errors on non-guilty requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oops, sent out the wrong patch, pls disregard.
-Daniel

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ... at least not in that place, because this can also fire for
> requests which have completed. Which then hits the assert in
> dma_fence_set_error.
>
> Since I'm not really clear what should be done here I pinged Chris,
> and he suggested we simply remove this for now.
>
> Found while stress-testing gpu reset using kms_busy, with about 0-3
> hits of it per complete run on my snb here.
>
> Testcase: igt/kms_busy.
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 1a8842f143fc..1c7453e2cc45 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2955,7 +2955,6 @@ static bool i915_gem_reset_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>                 skip_request(request);
>         } else {
>                 i915_gem_context_mark_innocent(request->ctx);
> -               dma_fence_set_error(&request->fence, -EAGAIN);
>         }
>
>         return guilty;
> --
> 2.13.2
>



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux