On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 13:29 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 06 Jul 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ideally .rst would referrence .rst with :ref:`` but since > > these documentation are different repository we cannot link > > like this. However I believe the main usage is through the > > compiled html pages and since we already reference another > > .html here I believe we should use our daily compiled doc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > As I wrote in my other mail, I think this is better. > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> could I just squash, keep the ack and merge? > > > > > --- > > drm-intel.rst | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drm-intel.rst b/drm-intel.rst > > index 5dcb7d8..fa1e9bc 100644 > > --- a/drm-intel.rst > > +++ b/drm-intel.rst > > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ the appropriate branches. > > > > If possible, the commit message should also contain a Fixes: tag as described in > > `Documentation/process/submitting-patches > > -<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_ > > + <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_ > > to aid the maintainers in identifying the right branch. > > > > Requesting Fixes Cherry-Pick Afterwards > > @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ It's not uncommon for a patch to have been committed before it's identified as a > > fix needing to be backported. > > > > If the patch is already in Linus' tree, please follow `stable kernel rules > > -<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst>`_. > > +<https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/stable-kernel-rules.html>`_. > > > > Otherwise, send an email to intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and > > drm-intel-fixes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx containing the subject of the patch, the > > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ An inexhaustive list of details to check: > > > > * The patch conforms to `Documentation/process/submitting-patches > > > > - <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_ > > + <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_ > > > > * The commit message is sensible, and includes adequate details and references. > > > > @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ On Confidence, Complexity, and Transparency > > > > * Reviewed-by. All patches must be reviewed, no exceptions. Please see > > "Reviewer's statement of oversight" in `Documentation/process/submitting-patches > > - <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_ > > + <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_ > > and `review training > > <http://blog.ffwll.ch/2014/08/review-training-slides.html>`_. > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
