Ideally .rst would referrence .rst with :ref:`` but since these documentation are different repository we cannot link like this. However I believe the main usage is through the compiled html pages and since we already reference another .html here I believe we should use our daily compiled doc. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> --- drm-intel.rst | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm-intel.rst b/drm-intel.rst index 5dcb7d8..fa1e9bc 100644 --- a/drm-intel.rst +++ b/drm-intel.rst @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ the appropriate branches. If possible, the commit message should also contain a Fixes: tag as described in `Documentation/process/submitting-patches -<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_ + <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_ to aid the maintainers in identifying the right branch. Requesting Fixes Cherry-Pick Afterwards @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ It's not uncommon for a patch to have been committed before it's identified as a fix needing to be backported. If the patch is already in Linus' tree, please follow `stable kernel rules -<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst>`_. +<https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/stable-kernel-rules.html>`_. Otherwise, send an email to intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and drm-intel-fixes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx containing the subject of the patch, the @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ An inexhaustive list of details to check: * The patch conforms to `Documentation/process/submitting-patches - <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_ + <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_ * The commit message is sensible, and includes adequate details and references. @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ On Confidence, Complexity, and Transparency * Reviewed-by. All patches must be reviewed, no exceptions. Please see "Reviewer's statement of oversight" in `Documentation/process/submitting-patches - <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_ + <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_ and `review training <http://blog.ffwll.ch/2014/08/review-training-slides.html>`_. -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
