the patch that introduces this error didn't land yet....
so, could we squash to the original patch whenever that is reworked to
be resent?
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Manasi Navare
<manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The Cursor Coeff is lower 6 bits in the PORT_TX_DW4 register
> and hence the CURSOR_COEFF_MASK should be (0x3F << 0)
>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index c8647cf..64cc674 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define POST_CURSOR_2(x) ((x) << 6)
> #define POST_CURSOR_2_MASK (0x3F << 6)
> #define CURSOR_COEFF(x) ((x) << 0)
> -#define CURSOR_COEFF_MASK (0x3F << 6)
> +#define CURSOR_COEFF_MASK (0x3F << 0)
>
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_GRP_AE 0x162354
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_GRP_B 0x1623D4
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
