On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:27:40AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 02 Jun 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Validate the compliance test link parameters when the compliance > > test dpcd registers are read. Also validate them in compute_config > > before using them since the max values might have been reduced > > due to link training fallback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 29 +++++++++++++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > index 832786d..cda0f0a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > @@ -1678,12 +1678,15 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > > if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) { > > int index; > > > > - index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates, > > - intel_dp->num_common_rates, > > - intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate); > > - if (index >= 0) > > + /* Validate the compliance test data */ > > + if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate, > > + intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) { > > + index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates, > > + intel_dp->num_common_rates, > > + intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate); > > I think you still need to check index >= 0. intel_dp_link_params_valid > only checks the boundaries, not that the common rates actually contains > the value. > I thought that it would be implied that if it falls within the bounds then it would be part of the common_rates array. But yes no harm in checking the index >=0 here again. I will add this check. Manasi > > min_clock = max_clock = index; > > - min_lane_count = max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count; > > + min_lane_count = max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count; > > + } > > } > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i " > > "max bw %d pixel clock %iKHz\n", > > @@ -3961,8 +3964,7 @@ intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *sink_irq_vector) > > static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > { > > int status = 0; > > - int min_lane_count = 1; > > - int link_rate_index, test_link_rate; > > + int test_link_rate; > > uint8_t test_lane_count, test_link_bw; > > /* (DP CTS 1.2) > > * 4.3.1.11 > > @@ -3976,10 +3978,6 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > return DP_TEST_NAK; > > } > > test_lane_count &= DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT_MASK; > > - /* Validate the requested lane count */ > > - if (test_lane_count < min_lane_count || > > - test_lane_count > intel_dp->max_link_lane_count) > > - return DP_TEST_NAK; > > > > status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_LINK_RATE, > > &test_link_bw); > > @@ -3987,12 +3985,11 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Rate read failed\n"); > > return DP_TEST_NAK; > > } > > - /* Validate the requested link rate */ > > test_link_rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(test_link_bw); > > - link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates, > > - intel_dp->num_common_rates, > > - test_link_rate); > > - if (link_rate_index < 0) > > + > > + /* Validate the requested link rate and lane count */ > > + if (!intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, test_link_rate, > > + test_lane_count)) > > return DP_TEST_NAK; > > The changes here LGTM. > > > > > intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count = test_lane_count; > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx